tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23323026.post2599847273023399515..comments2023-10-09T07:16:37.801-07:00Comments on Duplicitous Primates: CrushingAaronhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03435148918107602176noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23323026.post-38811511385016014202007-02-22T17:15:00.000-08:002007-02-22T17:15:00.000-08:00The "contingency free" is just a cloak for a varia...The "contingency free" is just a cloak for a variation of the cosmic watercolorwash- Science has limits and faith is, well, unprovable therefore determinations using both are equally valid. <BR/><BR/>Not.<BR/><BR/>Harris calls it "puddle jumping" versus "walking on water".Aaronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03435148918107602176noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23323026.post-80810671896929314872007-02-22T11:28:00.000-08:002007-02-22T11:28:00.000-08:00Call me Patrick. I'm stuck with Vermontbard. Wish ...Call me Patrick. I'm stuck with Vermontbard. Wish I could change it but I haven't figured out how.<BR/><BR/>I haven't posted on this because I'm working again, after a winter hiatus. I get home and the whole family has an allergic reaction when I sit at the computer. So it goes.<BR/><BR/>Sullivan's answer was interesting. I don't buy it but I also haven't wrapped my head around it. I see that Sullivan has taken issue with Harrison's idea of a "contingency free" exploration of the world. This tries to make Harrison's assertion the focus of the discussion, but it does nothing to support Sullivan's religiosity.<BR/><BR/>More when I can! My batteries are running down...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com