Rick Warren vs. Sam Harris
With a weeping Jesus in between.
Doesn't Sam look poised to kick some ass? In all these debates, the facts and power of argument side squarely with Sam. The opponent is left to defend and dematerialize their argument into an inpenetrable, infinitely elusive phantasm of faith-- which is perfectly good enough for believers.
I'll comment after I'm done reading it.
This debate was ultimately silly. Warren does not believe in evolution and calls Harris arrogant for saying it is solid knowledge. How do you have a debate with someone this closed off from reality?